Apparel E-Commerce Purchase Experience Redesign

Duration: 12 months; Role: UX Lead; Team: 2 Buy Designers, 3 Design System Designers, 1 Copywriter, 3 Product Managers, 3 Developer teams; Platform: Web


The Challenge

Gap's purchase experience suffered from incremental changes made over time that resulted in an inconsistent user experience. Key problems included:

  • Inconsistent UI throughout the Purchase journey - Different visual patterns, button styles, and layout of elements created a fragmented experience

  • Confusing error messaging - Some text inputs were using inline validation that prematurely flagged the content as invalid as the user was still typing

  • Redundant copy - Repetitive content cluttered the interface

  • Outdated tech stack - Legacy platform limited performance

  • Outdated look and feel - The visual design no longer reflected modern user expectations

These issues were impacting user confidence and conversion rates throughout the purchase funnel.


The Solution

I led a comprehensive design audit and rebuild of the Bag, Checkout and Order Confirmation pages. Then established a unified cross-brand design system using Figma variables. The team created components from simple (buttons, inputs) to complex (Payment, Fulfillment selection) that worked seamlessly across Gap's multi-brand purchase experience.


Results

  • Bag to Checkout visits increased 3.1% - More users progressing from cart to checkout

  • Bag conversion increased 0.2% - Higher completion rates from shopping bag

  • Conversion Rate increased 0.2% - Overall improvement in purchase completion

  • Net RPV (Revenue Per Visit) increased 1.3% - Direct bottom-line business impact

  • Organizational Impact: This project established foundational design patterns and a working process that influenced Gap's broader design system approach.

Before: Purchase flow for a signed in shopper.

After: Purchase flow for a signed in shopper.

  • As UX Lead, I guided the design strategy and cross-functional collaboration for this redesign. My responsibilities included:

    • Leading comprehensive audit process - Directed the team in auditing existing components to identify inconsistencies and gaps

    • Defining new design foundation - Guided the creation of a cohesive design theme and component library for the purchase experience

    • Strategic prioritization - Led cross-functional discussions to prioritize enhancements based on user impact and technical feasibility

    • Documentation and requirements - Ensured all edge cases, user scenarios, and business logic were thoroughly documented and supported in the new design

    • Team coordination - Mentored designers through the design process while collaborating closely with PM and developers

    • Quality assurance - Maintained design consistency and user experience standards across all touchpoints

  • Current State Analysis: Through a comprehensive audit of the existing purchase experience, our team uncovered significant inconsistencies that were fragmenting the user journey.

    Key Audit Findings:

    • Component Inconsistency: Complex components that appeared across every page of the purchase path (Bag, Checkout, Order Confirmation) had different typography styles, colors, and order of elements

    • Lack of Standards: No unified design system governing purchase interactions

    • UX Debt: Legacy implementations had accumulated over time without systematic oversight

    Design Challenge: The audit revealed that users were encountering a different interface design language at each step of their purchase journey, undermining trust and usability.

  • Design Theme & Strategy: I led the team in developing a cleaner, more modern visual approach that took a generic cross-brand strategy. This was crucial since Gap's checkout experience supports mixed-brand shopping (Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta), requiring a cohesive system that didn't favor any single brand identity.

    Component System Development: Working closely with my design team, we systematically defined every component needed for the checkout experience:

    Atomic Components:

    • Buttons (primary, secondary, tertiary states) and links

    • Text inputs, text area inputs, dropdowns with consistent styling and error states

    • Radio buttons and checkboxes

    • Typography hierarchy and composed text styles

    • Color palette

    Complex Components:

    • Payment Selection: Credit card, PayPal, ApplePay, AfterPay and gift card options

    • Fulfillment Selection: Ship to address, Ship to UPS access point, store pickup, and delivery options

    • Address Forms: Standardized shipping and billing address collection

    • Promos and Rewards: Promo code application, application of rewards points

    • Order Summary: Consistent item display, pricing breakdown

  • Cross-functional Partnership:

    • Worked closely with Product Management to prioritize features and define technical requirements

    • Collaborated with multiple Engineering teams to identify backend service needs for new components, and to sequence what would be built in each sprint.

    • Worked with Design System UX Lead to coordinate tasks and clarify responsibilities between designers.

    Design System Innovation: This project piloted Figma variables to support future brand theming across the web experience, establishing patterns for a cross-brand theme.

    Project Challenges & Solutions: This initiative presented unique organizational challenges that required adaptive leadership:

    • New Design System Team: The project required rapid team building and process establishment

    • Undefined Roles: Navigated ambiguous role definitions by clearly establishing responsibilities and communication patterns across design, product, and engineering

    • Compressed Timeline: Managed an aggressive timeline by strategic prioritization and parallel workstreams

    • Legacy System Integration: Addressed technical constraints by defining new backend data requirements and coordinating priority alignment with engineering teams while simultaneously developing UI components

    • Design System Limitations: While Figma variables provided a foundation for cross-brand theming, we discovered they were too limited for brand expression in browse experiences where pages need stronger brand differentiation

    • Cross-Platform Alignment: The success of this web checkout redesign highlighted opportunities for consistency across platforms (web and native mobile app)

    • Organizational Readiness: Launching design system initiatives requires clear role definition and dedicated development resources from the outset

  • Broader Organizational Impact

    • Design System Direction: Our component library and Figma variables approach influenced the overall direction of Gap's design system strategy

    • Cross-Platform Initiative: The success of this work directly led to a new initiative to align Buy path UI consistency across web and native mobile applications

    • Process Improvements: Established patterns for cross-functional collaboration on complex design system projects that are now used across other initiatives

Next
Next

Discount Combinations